On February 18, 2026, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) issued notices to the federal government regarding a constitutional petition challenging the Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Act 2026. The petitioner, Advocate Abdul Wahab Farid, argues that the law is ultra vires the Constitution, claiming it contradicts Islamic teachings and undermines fundamental rights. The petitioners contend that the Act violates several constitutional articles, including Article 10-A, which guarantees the right to a fair trial, and Article 227, which relates to the provisions of the Holy Quran and Sunnah. The IHC bench has deferred the hearing of this case until April 16, 2026, indicating ongoing legal scrutiny surrounding this contentious legislation. The Express Tribune highlighted concerns that the law's vague definitions create legal uncertainty, making it prone to misuse, which could be dangerous for justice delivery. Additionally, the report emphasized the need for precision in defining terms within the law to prevent overreach, particularly regarding threats of divorce or polygamy, which are permissible under Islamic law but could be misinterpreted under the new legislation.
LEGISLATION
Islamabad High Court Challenges Domestic Violence Prevention Act 2026

The Islamabad High Court is reviewing a petition against the Domestic Violence Act 2026, citing constitutional conflicts and concerns over legal ambiguity amid rising crimes against women in Pakistan.
Detailed Analysis
COVERAGE ACROSS SOURCES
How different outlets covered this story.
3 outlets · 4 articles
Filter:
IA
ianslive
Updated 23h agoBR
Business Recorder
Updated 23h agoTL